I am working in our Metrotown branch office today as a substitute. We do not have a lot of drop-in customers and I can't do any follow-up for my existing customers. Therefore, I finally have chance to check all the work-related email messages I received during my holiday at the end of Oct, 2007. I found this interesting news article forwarded by my colleague.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071019/insurance_ruling_071019/20071019?hub=TopStories
I agree with the following comment.
DK
"Although I feel[sorry] for the plaintiffs because of their injuries, I can't believe the stupidity of this claim having to make its way up to the Supreme Court of Canada. At least the courts got it right. A judgment for the plaintiffs would have cost us all more money when renewing our policies."
The victims should have sued the other party rather than the insurer as the accidents have nothing to do with automobile accidents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Perhaps I am the only one who find this article interesting... ~_~
Post a Comment